Sunday, March 31, 2013

Ready, Set, Research!


Action research is important for learning and school improvement. Action research, or sometimes called classroom research or practitioner inquiry, is a process in which the teacher or principal reflect on current teaching practices for learning and create a plan that has a scientific approach for improving the school. (Dana, 2009).  This inquiry process supports what lots of professionals in education always mention in school’s visions and mission statements about being a life-long learner. It is important to never stop learning and make sure your organization is action research oriented. As I mentioned before this is the first time that I have had a clear definition and explanation of what action research consist of. In learning about this process I have reflected on actions that my own principal has done at our school. She is a believer of action research; I just did not know how to recognize it. I wish that when I was a teacher she would have involved me in the process. If I would have done this in my classroom I would have helped with student achievement. Granted I did look at the trends in the data and tried my best with trying to close the achievement gap. How much more effective would I have been if I would have implemented a program or a strategy and monitored the success? If the administrators would have involved me in the process this would have built capacity among the teachers and give the staff a sense of ownership in our school’s success (Dana, 2009).

Finding time to engage in inquiry can be rewarding. Administrative inquiry is very important for a campus principal to practice. Time has to be found in their busy schedule to engage in inquiry. When the principal makes themselves the “head learner” it shows the rest of the staff a great model of how inquiry will increase the effectiveness of a school, (Dana, 2009). When starting an action research project a problem is defined, literature on the subject is found and reviewed, changes are made based on new findings and understandings, and data is taken. Once all the data is collected over an extended period of time, it is looked at for trends and analyzed to give information if instruction improved or the problem was solved.  This type of research encourages discussions with all stakeholders about how to improve student achievement and instructional practices.

Not only did I learn from my readings, but I learned from my colleagues when blogging. I was able to look at samples of other action research plans. It is very beneficial to see samples and compare and contrast my understandings with others. I was very hesitant when I heard I had to blog. I have avoided anything to do with technology because of my lack of understanding. Looking at it know I am glad that I was challenged and had assignments dealing with blogging. I also was able to see that I was not the only person that had to edit my plan over and over again. I was also able to see that other campuses had similar challenges as my school. Receiving comments from my followers also assisted me with my learning. Having another pair of eyes to look at my plan I was made aware of things I did not think about and ways to make my project better. For example, I was told I needed to be specific on the types of interventions that I would be using in my research. I was also told that I needed to mention that I was only focusing on one certain content area, which I did not mention in my plan. I also had comments that made me think about how I would support my findings with literature. I am still unsure about where to find these resources, but I will be sure to blog about this because I am sure someone will have some ideas.

The discussion board was another resource that helped me grow. By reading others thoughts and reflection I was able to see the process. The discussion board helped me with generating wonderings and finding the purpose of my action plan. Here I was also given comments that helped me narrow down my focus. I was questioned about certain aspects of my plan, which caused me to be rethink my explanations. This forced me to make sure I was clear with my explanations and everyone could understand my purpose and why I chose my goal.

I also enjoyed the interviews with administrators from other school districts. The interview that made me think and caused me to reflect is the one with Dr. Timothy Chargois. Listening to him opened my eyes to the importance of research on the campus and classroom level. One of the most powerful statements that are sticking with me is “The old adage of saying if I only touched one kid I’ve done….no sir that doesn’t work under today’s accountability”. I think it was an honest statement. It is alright to acknowledge you made a child feel better about them self, but it is always important that student progresses academically. Until the laws change about testing, this is a fact of education, student achievement is critical. His advice about being a lifelong learner being a key to students’ success is also very true.

 
“Never stop learning. If your green your growing, if you’re brown your dying”.

 
The concept of changing quantifying qualitative data is also a concept that made me think. Teachers have to produce results and have to use data to impact their instruction. Instructional strategies and methods have to be looked at and monitored to promote student achievement.  No longer should teachers be only knowledgeable in pedagogy and content, but also have to understand the benefits of performing research within their own classroom to produce results. Being action research oriented is important for teachers to accomplish results.  
 
I feel as if I am ready to pursue my research. I am looking forward to this opportunity to help my campus and especially the teachers.


 “If your kids are going to excel,….you’ve got to look at what they’re doing. Where are they, where do they need to be, how do we get them there? That’s essentially what inquiry is”, (Dana, pg.15).

 
Dana, Nancy Fichtman (2009). Leading with passion and knowledge: The principal as action Researcher. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sunday, March 24, 2013

Revised Action Plan for Review

I have added a few items to my plan per the suggestions of my peers' comments and my site supervisor. I still feel that my goal is not specific enough. Any suggestions welcomed. I am only working with math students 3rd-5th grade for my research project. I am also looking for research about early intervention and intervention suggestions. If anyone knows of a site or have any direction for me it would be great. Thanks for your time. I have highlighted the new items I added.

Action Planning Template
School Vision: Every student can learn. We are the critical determinants.
Goal: To see student achievement increase on district benchmark assessments and STAAR.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
Meet with campus supervisor to review action plan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alicia Chavez
March 2013
Plan
Principal will look over plan and make suggestions.
Disaggregate data of students that received interventions prior to the last district benchmark
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alicia Chavez
Math ALT
Math Interventionist
March 2013
Data of 3rd-5th grade math district benchmark and list of students that were provide interventions.
Progress monitoring notes of interventionist.
Data collected and sorted by student. Data will show objectives and TEKS that students have increased in.
Attend RTI meeting

 

 

 

 

 

 

RTI facilitator

Math ALT

March-May 2013

RTI plans

Intervention suggestions

Attendance in this meeting will supply direction on intervention for struggling students.
Leadership takes Bill Daggett Survey of school expectations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leadership team
(Principal, Assistant principal, Counselor,  RTI facilitator, Bilingual interventionist, reading and math ALT
March 25,2013
Survey and discussion
This survey will be used to plan for the upcoming year
Disaggregate data of students that received intervention and after school tutoring.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alicia Chavez, math ALT
May 2013
STAAR results
Data collected and sorted by student. Data will show objectives and TEKS that students have increased in.
 
 
 
 
Work on Campus Improvement plan
 
 
 
 
 
Leadership team
April-May 2013
STAAR Results
EOY Hemi results of lower grades
Using the data collect goals and action plans will be determined for the following year
Survey Teachers to identify areas of concern and TEKS that they saw were a challenge for the majority of their students.

 

 

 

 

 

Math ALT

May

2013

Suggestions from teachers

Surveys will be used to identify some areas of concern
Teachers fill out cumulative folder reviews

 

 

 

 

 

 

Teachers

Administration directive

ALTS

August

2013

Cumulative folders

Class list

Cum Review Document

Teachers will review cum folders looking at results of district, TELPAS, STAAR, TAKS, DRA, and HEMI results
Meet with teachers on students that are consider at risk
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Math Alt
September 2013
Results by class list
Students that need interventions will be determine by teacher and facilitated by ALT Data collected and sorted by student. Data will show objectives and TEKS that students have increased in.
Interventions will be giving to students that did not meet expectations on prior years EOY assessments (3rd-5th)
Math ALT
Teachers 3rd-5th
September- October 2013
Data of students will be pulled from Eduphoria and filtered to show the students in need of assistance
Scores of assessments
Disaggregate Math BA 1 data to see improvement in targeted math students
Math ALT 3rd-5th grade teachers
October 2013
Data of students being monitored and receiving interventions
Benchmark assessment scores
Provide interventions to targeted students and instructional strategies to teachers
Math Alt and teacher 3rd-5th
October-December 2013
Data of specific TEKS not showing 70% or higher
Percentages of TEKS
Disaggregate Math BA 2 data to see improvement in targeted math students
Math ALT 3rd-5th grade teachers
December 2013
Data of students being monitored and receiving interventions
Benchmark assessment scores
Provide interventions to targeted students and instructional strategies to teachers
Math Alt and teacher 3rd-5th
December-February 2014
Data of specific TEKS not showing 70% or higher
Percentages of TEKS
Disaggregate Math BA 3 data to see improvement in targeted math students
Math ALT 3rd-5th grade teachers
February-March 2014
Data of students being monitored and receiving interventions
Benchmark assessment scores
Provide interventions to targeted students and instructional strategies to teachers
Math Alt and teacher 3rd-5th
March-April 2014
Data of specific TEKS not showing 70% or higher
Percentages of TEKS
Disaggregate data of targeted students from STAAR
Leadership team
May 2014
Data of targeted students
STAAR Scores

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Action Research Plan


Action Planning Template
School Vision: Every student can learn. We are the critical determinants.
Goal: To see student achievement increase on district benchmark assessments and STAAR.
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
Meet with campus supervisor to review action plan
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alicia Chavez
March 2013
Plan
Principal will look over plan and make suggestions.
Disaggregate data of students that received interventions prior to the last district benchmark
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alicia Chavez
Math ALT
Math Interventionist
March 2013
Data of 3rd-5th grade math district benchmark and list of students that were provide interventions.
Progress monitoring notes of interventionist.
Data collected and sorted by student. Data will show objectives and TEKS that students have increased in.
Leadership takes Bill Daggett Survey of school expectations
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Leadership team
(Principal, Assistant principal, Counselor,  RTI facilitator, Bilingual interventionist, reading and math ALT
March 25,2013
Survey and discussion
This survey will be used to plan for the upcoming year
Disaggregate data of students that received intervention and after school tutoring.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alicia Chavez, math ALT
May 2013
STAAR results
Data collected and sorted by student. Data will show objectives and TEKS that students have increased in.
 
 
 
 
Work on Campus Improvement plan
 
 
 
 
 
Leadership team
April-May 2013
STAAR Results
EOY Hemi results of lower grades
Using the data collect goals and action plans will be determined for the following year
Meet with teachers on students that are consider at risk
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Math Alt
September 2013
Results by class list
Students that need interventions will be determine by teacher and facilitated by ALT Data collected and sorted by student. Data will show objectives and TEKS that students have increased in.
Interventions will be giving to students that did not meet expectations on prior years EOY assessments (3rd-5th)
Math ALT
Teachers 3rd-5th
September- October 2013
Data of students will be pulled from Eduphoria and filtered to show the students in need of assistance
Scores of assessments
Disaggregate Math BA 1 data to see improvement in targeted math students
Math ALT 3rd-5th grade teachers
October 2013
Data of students being monitored and receiving interventions
Benchmark assessment scores
Provide interventions to targeted students and instructional strategies to teachers
Math Alt and teacher 3rd-5th
October-December 2013
Data of specific TEKS not showing 70% or higher
Percentages of TEKS
Disaggregate Math BA 2 data to see improvement in targeted math students
Math ALT 3rd-5th grade teachers
December 2013
Data of students being monitored and receiving interventions
Benchmark assessment scores
Provide interventions to targeted students and instructional strategies to teachers
Math Alt and teacher 3rd-5th
December-February 2014
Data of specific TEKS not showing 70% or higher
Percentages of TEKS
Disaggregate Math BA 3 data to see improvement in targeted math students
Math ALT 3rd-5th grade teachers
February-March 2014
Data of students being monitored and receiving interventions
Benchmark assessment scores
Provide interventions to targeted students and instructional strategies to teachers
Math Alt and teacher 3rd-5th
March-April 2014
Data of specific TEKS not showing 70% or higher
Percentages of TEKS
Disaggregate data of targeted students from STAAR
Leadership team
May 2014
Data of targeted students
STAAR Scores